Nieuws

Maar dat wordt niet per student vastgesteld: de treuzelaars onder hen hebben dus geluk.

Het kabinet heeft ook gekeken naar studenten met een aanvullende beurs en/of basisbeurs. Als zij hun recht op deze beurs verliezen in de maanden juli, augustus en september, krijgen ze een tegemoetkoming. Voor hbo- en wo-studenten gaat het om eenmalig 1.500 euro.

Andere studenten kunnen hun studievertraging inhalen in de loop van hun opleiding, is de gedachte van minister Van Engelshoven. Dat zei ze twee weken geleden in debat met de Tweede Kamer.

De oppositie wilde meer geld voor gedupeerde studenten. Een voorstel van de PvdA kreeg zelfs de helft van de Tweede Kamer achter zich: wie nu een aanvullende beurs heeft (van eerstejaars tot afstudeerder) zou daar drie maanden langer het recht op moeten krijgen. Alleen de vier coalitiepartijen (VVD, CDA, D66 en ChristenUnie) stemden ertegen, in afwachting van de plannen van de minister.

CDA en D66 hadden het kabinet eerder in een motie opgeroepen om de gevolgen van de coronacrisis voor studenten in beeld te brengen en “waar nodig studenten te ondersteunen, bijvoorbeeld bij opgetreden studievertraging”.

Het besluit van vandaag is het antwoord op die motie. Het kabinet neemt een ‘generieke maatregel’ voor een grote groep studenten zonder uit te zoeken wie daadwerkelijk last heeft van de crisis en wie niet. Dat maakt de maatregel makkelijker en sneller uitvoerbaar.

Studenten kunnen overigens van hun universiteit of hogeschool een beurs krijgen als ze zelf ziek zijn geworden, zoals de minister in het debat zei. Daarvoor moeten ze een beroep doen op het zogeheten profileringsfonds. Dat geldt ook voor studenten die mantelzorg moeten verlenen of in andere bijzondere omstandigheden verkeren.

Wel verschillen de regels voor deze profileringsfondsen nogal. Aan sommige universiteiten moeten studenten snel zijn als ze er een beroep op willen doen, anders vissen ze achter het net.

Zie artikel Univers: https://universonline.nl/2020/05/15/corona-535-euro-collegegeld-retour-voor-late-afstudeerders

The lawsuit alleges that their children were killed or injured while mining for cobalt in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Cobalt is a key component of rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, of the type used in electronic devices manufactured by these five companies.

The lawsuit alleges that “the young children mining Defendants’ cobalt are not merely being forced to work full-time, extremely dangerous mining jobs at the expense their educations and futures; they are being regularly maimed and killed by tunnel collapses and other known hazards common to cobalt mining in the DRC.” Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Dell and Tesla are alleged to have been aiding and abetting the deaths and serious injuries of the Claimant’s children working in cobalt mines in the supply chain of the tech corporations.

The lawsuit alleges that the companies “are knowingly benefiting from and providing substantial support to this ‘artisanal’ mining system in the DRC. Defendants know and have known for a significant period of time the reality that DRC’s cobalt mining sector is dependent upon children, with males performing the most hazardous work in the primitive cobalt mines, including tunnel digging. These boys are working under stone age conditions for paltry wages and at immense personal risk to provide cobalt that is essential to the so-called ‘high tech’ sector, dominated by Defendants and other companies.”

The families are seeking compensation for, among others, forced labor, unjust enrichment, negligent supervision, intentional infliction of emotional distress, wages promised but not paid, and “the loss of assets and of educational and business opportunities as a result of Defendants’ illegal conduct”, “damages for the mental anguish and pain and suffering Plaintiffs experienced as a result of being forced to labor against their will in horrific conditions and subjecting them to serious injuries and death.” The lawsuit further seeks an order for the tech companies to create a fund to ensure appropriate medical care for all those children who were injured while mining cobalt for the tech companies and to clean up the environmental impact of mining cobalt in DRC by the Defendants.

According to Siddharth Kara, an expert on modern day slavery, “more than 60% of the world’s supply of cobalt is mined in the ‘copper belt’ of the south-eastern provinces of DRC.” His research suggests that “more than 255,000 creuseurs mining cobalt in DRC, at least 35,000 of whom are children, some as young as six.” His research claims that “children under the age of 14 years earn an average of $0.81 per day, adult females earn an average of $1.02 per day, and adult males earn an average of $2.04 per day.”

Our protest has been growing ever since. Join us too!

We have alarmed Microsoft multiple times about the inhumane circumstances of Congolese miners at their suppliers' sites. In our calls, we urged them to take measure to stop the exploitation! Unfortunately, we have not received a response yet.

In one village we visited, people showed us how the water in the local stream that they drank that they said was contaminated by the discharge of waste from a mineral processing plant.”

“There has been mining in the Katanga region for over 100 years, but there has been tragically little research into the impact that pollution has had. This report should prompt the DRC authorities to urgently step up their investigation into the impact of this pollution, and health monitoring of people working in the mines.”

“The alarming findings of this report suggest that the damage done may have a long legacy. This demonstrates the need for greater regulation of the mining sector to enforce environmental and worker protections. This also shows why the multinationals who profit from these mines need to fulfil their responsibility to respect human rights, ensuring they prevent pollution that damages people and the planet. They also need to provide remedy to those who have been harmed by their business operations. The DRC’s mining sector should benefit local communities, not just powerful corporations.”