Op 1 juli 2024 is een nieuwe Huis- en hobbydierenlijst in werking getreden, die bepaalt welke diersoorten mogen worden gehouden. Verschillende partijen maakten bezwaar tegen de nieuwe lijst en vroegen om een voorlopige voorziening om deze in zijn geheel te schorsen, maar de rechter wees dit af.
Eerste verzoek voorlopige voorziening afgewezen • De rechter oordeelde vandaag, 2 juli 2021, dat de aangevoerde bezwaren te complex waren voor deze procedure. • Verder oordeelde de rechter dat er geen direct bezwaar en beroep openstond tegen het niet opnemen van zoogdiersoorten op de Huis- en hobbydierenlijst die niet Bijlage 1, tabel 1 of 2 van de Regeling houders van dieren stonden. • Ook oordeelde de rechter dat als het hele Besluit Huis- en hobbydierenlijst werd opgeschort, geen enkel dier meer gehouden mocht worden omdat dan het verbod op het houden van niet-aangewezen dieren (art. 2.2. Wet dieren) alles bepalend zou zijn. • De rechter hield het bij een belangenafweging en achtte het belang van de Minister zwaarder dan van de verzoekers.
Tweede verzoek voorlopige voorziening wordt aangepast aan uitspraak
Er is al een tweede voorlopige voorziening aangevraagd. Deze gaan we aanpassen, rekening houdend met de eerste uitspraak.
• De voorlopige voorziening wordt beperkt tot soorten die wel op de oude lijst stonden maar niet op de nieuwe. Volgens de rechter is voor deze soorten de procedure wel toegankelijk. • In deze procedure worden minder complexe punten aangevoerd, namelijk dat de beoordelingen voor deze soorten niet goed zijn onderbouwd en dat castratie, sterilisatie en separatie ernstige nadelige gevolgen hebben voor de gezondheid en het welzijn van de dieren.
We hebben hiermee meer kans op succes.
Handhaving wordt uiterst lastig Verder moet voor de soorten die niet al op de eerste lijst stonden en ook niet op de tweede lijst zijn opgenomen, in het oog worden gehouden dat, wanneer er een handhavingsbesluit wordt genomen, tegen dit besluit bezwaar en beroep open staat. Daarbij is er enerzijds sprake van opnieuw de mogelijkheid om een voorlopige voorziening te vragen, kort wegens motiveringsgebrek en risico voor de gezondheid en het welzijn van dieren bij castratie/sterilisatie/separatie.
Anderzijds is er dan wel de mogelijkheid om in die zaak succesvol beroep te doen op het feit dat het verbod in strijd is met het Europeesrechtelijk kader. Handhaving gaat daarmee dus voor alle soorten heel moeilijk worden, zeker als al in de 2e voorlopige voorziening wordt vastgesteld dat een onderbouwing die bestaat uit verwijzingen naar al dan niet wetenschappelijke literatuur een onzorgvuldige motivering vormt.
Mogelijkheden bij ontheffing
Ook wanneer een ontheffing wordt aangevraagd en geweigerd, kan in bezwaar en beroep de onrechtmatigheid van het onderliggende verbod wegens strijd met het Europeesrechtelijk kader worden ingeroepen, evenals schending van de eisen die op Europees niveau worden gesteld aan de mogelijkheid om ontheffing te verkrijgen. Volgens de Europese jurisprudentie mag een dergelijke ontheffing niet worden geweigerd als is voldaan aan de met de regeling beoogde belangen, in dit geval de gezondheid en het welzijn van dieren en de gezondheid en veiligheid van mensen.
To: House of Representatives 9h May 2023 Attn. Committee of Justice and Security, Attn.
Committee of Foreign Affairs, PO Box 20018 2500 EA The Hague
Urgent Action Needed: End the Plight of Sudanese Asylum Seekers in the Netherlands Amid Ongoing Crisis and War in Sudan"
Your Excellency,
Allow us to start with the warnings issued by international organisations that Sudan will suffer an unimaginable humanitarian catastrophe if the ongoing war does not stop permanently.
The intense fighting is putting the lives, safety, and security of civilians at grave risk all over Sudan. The new escalation in violence is exacerbating an already devastating situation and making people desperately need urgent help. At least more than 500 people have died and thousands injured since the power struggle between Sudan's army and paramilitary group Rapid Support Forces (RSF) descended into fighting almost four weeks ago.
The fighting has pushed Sudan's population to near breaking point, with food becoming scarce, electricity cut off and many hospitals shut down. To make things worse, multiple aid agencies have suspended operations, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) said it was gearing up for potentially tens of thousands of people including children, women, and the elderly, fleeing to neighbouring countries.
The UN refugee agency also stated that “the ongoing brutal conflict has forced more than 100,000 Sudanese Refugees to flee neighboring countries, and at least 20,000 Sudanese refugees to flee to Chad from Darfur”, which it describes as “one of the regions most affected by violence of Sudan, and where growing instability might cause much larger displacement in the coming weeks.”
Regrettably, the situation in Sudan remains volatile. There are no positive signs on the horizon about an imminent end to the fighting, and people in Sudan are still living in fear every single day. Bodies are scattered in the streets, children, and women are among the victims. It seems the voice of bullets has prevailed over the voice of wisdom, sanity and the sanctity of our homeland and the safety of its citizens.
The signatories believes that the dilemma of the transitional period lies in the existence of multiple heads of power and decision-making centres. In addition, the de facto authority is neither elected nor decentralized and is unable to take decisive decisions. We are particularly saddened that once again, avaricious, and power-hungry men have trampled upon the needs and wishes of Sudanese people.
In the face of this tragic scene, the world watched with interest how the concerned countries hastened to evacuate their diplomatic missions and nationals from Sudan, which left an impression among many that the crisis is likely to deteriorate rapidly.
However, we are particularly saddened to see these countries racing to evacuate their nationals from Sudan, while they stand by and watch the catastrophic scene in this country. The paradox here is that the majority of these countries provide support to the two warring parties, the army and the Rapid Support Forces, in accordance with their interests. We are also shocked to learn that some of these countries have ruled out introducing safe and legal routes for Sudanese fleeing the war to seek asylum in their soil.
The signatories strongly believes that the relevant Dutch authorities should grant all Sudanese asylum seekers the right to settle immediately and without any conditions under their applicable legislations, and in the light of the ongoing war in Sudan.
Those unfortunate people and their families have endured years of uncertainty and are traumatized as a result, let alone the psychological, emotional, and financial problems they are experiencing. Many suffer from panic attacks, nightmares, and psychological problems due to the long wait for decisions regarding their asylum applications.
Undoubtedly, the ongoing war in their country, the lack of security and basics elements of normal life for the citizens there and the constant concern for the safety of their families have exacerbated the suffering of these people and made their psychological and mental conditions worse than ever.
We hereby strongly appeal to your esteemed administration to take the necessary measures to end the plight of Sudanese asylum seekers, their long suffering and grant them asylum to prove that the Netherlands is at the forefront of sponsoring countries for refugees fleeing repression and persecution in their country in search of safe havens.
Sincerely,
Signatories: 1. Broad National Movement. 2. Darfur Union. 3. Here to Support Stichting. 4. M2M. 5. Stichting Present Amsterdam 6. Sudanese Baathist Party. 7. Sudanese Communist Party. 8. Sudanese Cultural Association. 9. Sudanese Refugees Organization. 10. Wij zijn hier.
Signatories according to petition.nl website < https://petities.nl/petitions/bescherm-de-soedanese-asielzoekers/signatures?locale=en> :
..
To: House of Representatives
Attn. Rt Hon Vera Bergkamp,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
PO Box 20018
2500 EA The Hague
Subject: Urgent Action Needed: End the Plight of Sudanese Asylum Seekers in the Netherlands in Light of Ongoing War in Sudan"
Your Excellency,
Allow us to start with the warnings issued by international organizations that Sudan will suffer an unimaginable humanitarian catastrophe if the ongoing war does not stop permanently.
The intense fighting is putting the lives, safety, and security of civilians at grave risk all over Sudan.
The new escalation in violence is exacerbating an already devastating situation and making people desperately need urgent help. At least more than 500 people have died and thousands injured since the power struggle between Sudan's army and paramilitary group Rapid Support Forces (RSF) descended into fighting almost four weeks ago.
The fighting has pushed Sudan's population to near breaking point, with food becoming scarce, electricity cut off and many hospitals shut down. To make things worse, multiple aid agencies have suspended operations, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) said it was gearing up for potentially tens of thousands of people including children, women, and the elderly, fleeing to neighbouring countries.
The UN refugee agency also stated that ?the ongoing brutal conflict has forced more than 100,000 Sudanese Refugees to flee neighboring countries, and at least 20,000 Sudanese refugees to flee to Chad from Darfur?, which it describes as ?one of the regions most affected by violence of Sudan, and where growing instability might cause much larger displacement in the coming weeks.?
Regrettably, the situation in Sudan remains volatile. There are no positive signs on the horizon about an imminent end to the fighting, and people in Sudan are still living in fear every single day. Bodies are scattered in the streets, children, and women are among the victims. It seems the voice of bullets has prevailed over the voice of wisdom, sanity and the sanctity of our homeland and the safety of its citizens.
The signatories believes that the dilemma of the transitional period lies in the existence of multiple heads of power and decision-making centres. In addition, the de facto authority is neither elected nor decentralized and is unable to take decisive decisions. We are particularly saddened that once again, avaricious, and power-hungry men have trampled upon the needs and wishes of Sudanese people.
In the face of this tragic scene, the world watched with interest how the concerned countries hastened to evacuate their diplomatic missions and nationals from Sudan, which left an impression among many that the crisis is likely to deteriorate rapidly.
However, we are particularly saddened to see these countries racing to evacuate their nationals from Sudan, while they stand by and watch the catastrophic scene in this country. The paradox here is that the majority of these countries provide support to the two warring parties, the army and the Rapid Support Forces, in accordance with their interests. We are also shocked to learn that some of these countries have ruled out introducing safe and legal routes for Sudanese fleeing the war to seek asylum in their soil.
The signatories strongly believes that the relevant Dutch authorities should grant all Sudanese asylum seekers the right to settle immediately and without any conditions under their applicable legislations, and in the light of the ongoing war in Sudan.
Those unfortunate people and their families have endured years of uncertainty and are traumatized as a result, let alone the psychological, emotional, and financial problems they are experiencing. Many suffer from panic attacks, nightmares, and psychological problems due to the long wait for decisions regarding their asylum applications.
Undoubtedly, the ongoing war in their country, the lack of security and basics elements of normal life for the citizens there and the constant concern for the safety of their families have exacerbated the suffering of these people and made their psychological and mental conditions worse than ever.
We hereby strongly appeal to your esteemed administration to take the necessary measures to end the plight of Sudanese asylum seekers, their long suffering and grant them asylum to prove that the Netherlands is at the forefront of sponsoring countries for refugees fleeing repression and persecution in their country in search of safe havens.
Sincerely,
Voorafgaand aan de gemeenteraadsvergadering Borsele op 11 mei aanstaande wordt deze petitie ingediend. In totaal ondersteunen 428 mensen de petitie (inclusief handtekeningenlijsten).
Allow us to start with the warnings issued by international organisations that Sudan will suffer an unimaginable humanitarian catastrophe if the ongoing war does not stop permanently. The intense fighting is putting the lives, safety, and security of civilians at grave risk all over Sudan. The new escalation in violence is exacerbating an already devastating situation and making people desperately need urgent help.
At least more than 500 people have died and thousands injured since the power struggle between Sudan's army and paramilitary group Rapid Support Forces (RSF) descended into fighting almost two weeks ago. The fighting has pushed Sudan's population to near breaking point, with food becoming scarce, electricity cut off and many hospitals shut down. To make things worse, multiple aid agencies have suspended operations, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) said it was gearing up for potentially tens of thousands of people fleeing to neighbouring countries.
The UN refugee agency also stated that “the ongoing brutal conflict has forced at least 20,000 Sudanese refugees to flee to Chad from Darfur”, which it describes as “one of the regions most affected by violence of Sudan, and where growing instability might cause much larger displacement in the coming weeks.” Regrettably, the situation in Sudan remains volatile. There are no positive signs on the horizon about an imminent end to the fighting, and people in Sudan are still living in fear every single day. It seems the voice of bullets has prevailed over the voice of wisdom, sanity and the sanctity of our homeland and the safety of its citizens. The signatories believes that the dilemma of the transitional period lies in the existence of multiple heads of power and decision-making centres. In addition, the de facto authority is neither elected nor decentralized and is unable to take decisive decisions. We are particularly saddened that once again, avaricious, and power-hungry men have trampled upon the needs and wishes of Sudanese people. In the face of this tragic scene, the world watched with interest how the concerned countries hastened to evacuate their diplomatic missions and nationals from Sudan, which left an impression among many that the crisis is likely to deteriorate rapidly. However, we are particularly saddened to see these countries racing to evacuate their nationals from Sudan, while they stand by and watch the catastrophic scene in this country. The paradox here is that the majority of these countries provide support to the two warring parties, the army and the Rapid Support Forces, in accordance with their interests. We are also shocked to learn that some of these countries have ruled out introducing safe and legal routes for Sudanese fleeing the war to seek asylum in their soil. The signatories strongly believes that the relevant Dutch authorities should grant all Sudanese asylum seekers the right to settle immediately and without any conditions under their applicable legislations. Those unfortunate people and their families have endured years of uncertainty and are traumatized as a result, let alone the psychological, emotional, and financial problems they are experiencing.
Many suffer from panic attacks, nightmares, and psychological problems due to the long wait for decisions regarding their asylum applications. Undoubtedly, the ongoing war in their country, the lack of security and basics elements of normal life for the citizens there and the constant concern for the safety of their families have exacerbated the suffering of these people and made their psychological and mental conditions worse than ever.
We hereby strongly appeal to your esteemed administration to take the necessary measures to end the plight of Sudanese asylum seekers, their long suffering and grant them asylum to prove that the Netherlands is at the forefront of sponsoring countries for refugees fleeing repression and persecution in their country in search of safe havens.
https://twitter.com/hermendegraaf/status/1653057586650816512.
Onze acties voor het redden van Bossen gaan door in heel Nederland
Wij luiden de noodklok
Omdat Staatsbosbeheer van plan is om nog veel meer hectare bos te kappen.
Klokkenluider Citaat: “Men wil de onvervangbare mooie bomen met subsidie verstoken in ziekmakende biomassa centrales. Men wil de natuur vernietigen zodat een enorme kale vlakte overblijft waar Staatsbosbeheer nog eens 200 voetbalvelden met zand wil gaan kiepen om daarmee de indruk te wekken dat men het voor het aanleggen van een zandgebied en voor biodiversiteit doet, maar zij maken de biodiversiteit kapot, het gaat hun alleen maar om geld en het innen van subsidies voor het verstoken van bomen in ziekmakende houtovens.
Zij hebben gelogen en bedrog gepleegd want de bomen halen stikstof uit de lucht, ze zorgen voor verkoeling, en ze houden de bodem vast en dat is nodig voor de veiligheid, men liegt dat het gedrukt staat, meer klokkenluiders spreken van corruptie omkoping, er is helemaal geen M.E.R (Milieu Effect Rapportage) gemaakt, er is gelogen, rapporten zijn vervalst en men liegt dat het om beschermende maatregelen voor “de natuur” zou gaan. De kap moet verboden worden en er dient een parlementaire enquete te komen naar corruptie/omkoping, de vreselijke aanslag op flora en fauna zoals de massale boomkap in Nederland en de miljardenzwendel/subsidie op het verstoken van bomen, de zeer grote schade, het ziek worden van steeds meer Nederlanders( longkanker/copd) door het inademen van /fijnstof/gifstoffen die vrijkomen bij het verbranden van hout in biomassa-centrales
Bewoners van Schoorl vragen u om hen mee te helpen om het bos te behouden. Ons mooiste duingebied van Nederland Trekt 2,2 miljoen bezoekers en dat is omdat ons gebied prachtig is zoals het is Wij houden van ons bos en denken dat u ook van ons bos houdt. Help ons dit bos te behouden
De handtekeningen (digitaal en schriftelijk samen 924) zijn inmiddels overhandigd aan de gemeenteraad.